| UNDERTAKING # | DESCRIPTION | |
| U Hydro # 1 |
October 10, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Oct 7, 2003 p. 53 Undertake to provide the breakdown for the end of June of the net operating expenses |
|
| U Hydro # 2 |
October 10, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 9, 2003 p. 112 RE: Chart in Wm Wells evidence Vol. 1-pg 8 Undertake to have the Chart reproduced with Year one at the 100 index being 1997 |
|
| U Hydro # 3 |
October 15, 2003 Requested by Board Hearing Counsel - Transcript Reference Oct 10, 2003 p. 60 Undertake to provide the date for the six indices that Grant Thornton has recommended in their performance report for 2000 to 2003. Response: 2003-10-15 Transcript – Pgs. 3-6, lines 6-2 (Partial response) |
|
| U Hydro # 4 |
October 15, 2003 Requested by Consumer Advocate - Transcript Reference Oct 14, 2003 p. 24.25 - lines 25-18 Re: 2014 for Series V & X – advise as to whether or not there is an early option available, or if it would be financially feasible, for retiring these particular issues sooner. Response: 2003-10-15 Transcript – Pgs. 8-9, lines 23-20 |
|
| U Hydro # 5 |
October 15, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Oct 14, 2003 Pgs. 90-91 – lines 90-18 Re: Business improvement projects – tracking of internal costs for 2003 – can you provide the costs to date for 2003? Response: 2003-10-15 Transcript – Pgs. 9-10, lines 21-12 |
|
| U Hydro # 6 |
October 15, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Oct 14, 2003 Pgs 106-107 – lines 18-13 Re: salaries and benefits for 2004 forecast – undertake to what part of the 128 relates to salaries and fringe benefits and what part relates to other potential savings. Response: 2003-10-15Transcript – Pgs.10-11, lines 13-2 |
|
| U Hydro # 7 |
October 15, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Oct 14, 2003 Pgs. 128-129, lines 11 – 6 Undertake to provide the number of Fulltime Equivalents that were reduced in 2003. Response: 2003-10-15Transcript Pgs.11-12, lines 3-24 |
|
| U Hydro # 8 |
October 16, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Oct 15, 2003 Pgs. 69-70, lines 21-2 Undertake to provide what is the value of the reduction in the temporary employees from 2002, 194 to the 2003 number of 131. Response: 2003-10-16Transcript Pgs. 119-112, lines 1-2 |
|
| U Hydro # 9 |
October 16, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Oct 15, 2003 Pgs. 75-76, lines 18-6 Re: Grant Thornton’s report on ‘02 year – page 24 of the table – total for Professional Services – Can you give the Board any sense of what makes up that other approximately $900,000? Response: 2003-10-16 Transcript Pgs. 120-122, lines 3-14 |
|
| U Hydro # 10 |
October 23, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 21, 2003 Pg. 138, lines 11-19 Re: Guide Curve – Would the (shape of the GREEN?) line this year be the same as last, if based on 3 or 4 years in the 1950’s Response: 2003-10-23 Transcript Pgs 3-8, lines13-3 |
|
| U Hydro # 11 |
October 23, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 21, 2003 Pg. 155, lines 4-9 Undertake to provide the annual average load growth projection for the Island interconnected System between 2003 and 2011, on the assumption that the 10 yr one that is referred to at page 33 of JRH evidence is from 2003-2012 Response: 2003-10-23 Transcript Pgs 8-9, lines 4-11 |
|
| U Hydro # 12 |
October 24, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 21, 2003 Pg. 156, lines 15-22 Undertake to get the number recalculated (re: pg 156 lines3-19)-average annual energy for Holyrood based on a 75% availability factor) Response: 2003-10-24 Transcript Pgs 41-43, lines 13-1 |
|
| U Hydro # 13 |
October 23, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 21, 2003 Pg. 169, lines 5-9 Undertake to provide the explanation that NP gave for the 2001 initial forecast and final forecast that was incorporated in the Cost of Service.(re: pg 165 lines 9-13) Response: 2003-10-23 Transcript Pgs. 9-14, lines 11-16 (Also refer to I # 15 (a), (b) and (c) |
|
| U Hydro # 14 |
October , 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 23 transcript Pg. 98-99, lines16-12 Undertake to provide an updated IC-180 – Rev. 1 – 2001 General Rate Application for the current test year, 2004 |
|
| U Hydro # 15 |
October 24, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 23 transcript Pgs.122-123, lines2-13 Undertake to provide further particulars on the September 18, 2003 and the requirements of engaging the GNP transmission at that particular event. Provide: (a) the time at which the generation supply occurred, (b) the duration for which that generation supply occurred and (c) the relevant capacity and energy that was engaged to assist at that time. Response: 2003-10-24 Transcript Pgs. 47-50, lines 1-6 |
|
| U Hydro # 16 |
October 24, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 23 transcript Pg. 123-124, lines 14-9 Undertake to provide updated figures on IC-235 NLH – re: operation of GNP generation for local load support since 1996 Response: 2003-10-24 Transcript Pgs 50-51, lines 7-3 |
|
| U Hydro # 17 |
October , 2003 Requested by Board Hearing Counsel - Transcript Reference Oct 24 transcript Pg. 6, lines 5-8 Undertake to update U No. 3 to have 2004 forecast figures as revised by Hydro, where it’s capable of being produced. |
|
| U Hydro # 18 |
October 24, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Oct 24 transcript Pgs 80-81, lines 16-8 Undertake to provide how the generation from the GNP on September 18 and into the early morning hours of September 19, compared to local loads on the GNP at that time. |
|
| U Hydro # 19 |
October 27, 2003 Requested by Consumer Advocate - Transcript Reference Oct 24 transcript Pg. 149, lines 6-19 (Re: CA-117 and NP-39) Undertake to find out if Hydro has undertaken any analysis prior to embarking upon purchases of these diesel generators, whether it’s more economical to lease as opposed to purchase? Response: Transcript October 27,2003 Page 117 Line 17 |
|
| U Hydro # 20 |
October 27, 2003 Requested by Consumer Advocate - Transcript Reference Oct 24 transcript Pg. 149, lines 20-24 (Re: CA-117 and NP-39) Undertake to provide the information in reference to Black Tickle, to show us the fuel in litres that was burned from the old generator as opposed to what’s going on in the new generator. Response: Transcript October 27,2003 Page 118 Line 24 |
|
| U Hydro # 21 |
October 27, 2003 Requested by Consumer Advocate - Transcript Reference Oct 24 transcript Pgs 150-152 , lines 24-16 (Re: NP-39) Undertake to provide: (a) the unit number and the amount of fuel for each unit so we can get a comparator of the new versus the old.(b) Whether the figure is available for how much fuel is burned per generator. Response: Transcript October 27, 2003 Page 120 Line 13-17 Page 120 Line 18 |
|
| U Hydro # 22 |
October 27, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Oct 24 transcript Pg. 172, lines 4-12 (Re: Schedule 5) Undertake to provide the number of vacant positions that you had as of the end of 2002 and the number that you have as of now? Response: Transcript October 27,2003 Page 121 Line 2 |
|
| U Hydro # 23 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by Consumer Advocate - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 21, lines 18-22 (Re: Schedule 5) Undertake to file the transcript that Hydro’s spokesperson made on VOCM radio? |
|
| U Hydro # 24 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 47-48 lines 10-11 (Changes in actual fixed assets for 2003) Undertake to provide a mathematical reconciliation to explain why changes have occurred? |
|
| U Hydro # 25 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by NF power - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 62, lines 11-14 Undertake to find out whether an analysis of the impact of the rural deficit has taken place. Response: Transcript Nov 12, 2003 Page 121 Line 13 - Page 126 Line 9 |
|
| U Hydro # 26 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by NF power - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 98, lines 2-7 Decommissioning Cost for Davis Inlet Response: Transcript Nov 12, 2003 Page 121 Line 13 - Page 126 Line 9 |
|
| U Hydro # 27 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by NF power - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 107, lines 12-21 Confirm whether Hydro is seeking the Fed. Gov’t to pay decommissioning costs at Davis (Inlet) Response: Transcript Nov 12, 2003 Page 121 Line 13 - Page 126 Line 9 |
|
| U Hydro # 28 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 145, lines 2-5 (Effect on accumulated depreciation) Provide a written reconciliation to how the numbers get reconciled( the depreciation in the year versus the actual depreciation for each of these years (less the losses)? |
|
| U Hydro # 29 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 178 , lines 25 Update the impact of the changes in fuel purchase for the remaining months of the year from what was filed on Oct.31? |
|
| U Hydro # 30 |
November 12, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 200 lines 9 Undertake to determine numbers-(effect of the change from 18% to 16% - What effect does that have up on the credit given to NP) |
|
| U Hydro # 31 |
November 14, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customer - Transcript Reference Nov 12 Transcript Pg. 209 lines 10 Provide a reconciliation of the number used in Mr. Haynes evidence and your evidence in the Cost of Service Study |
|
| U Hydro # 32 |
November 17, 2003 Requested by Board Hearing Counsel - Transcript Reference Nov 17 Transcript Pg. 16 line 24 Provide a ballpark figure of the breakdown of the generation demand related costs and the transmission demand related costs to arrive at the $7.00 figure? |
|
| U Hydro # 33 |
November 17, 2003 Requested by Board Hearing Counsel - Transcript Reference Nov 17 Pg 1. line 24 Calculate what the energy rate would be keeping a $7.00 kilowatt rate demand charge, if there was only one block? |
|
| U Hydro # 34 |
November 17, 2003 Requested by NF Power - Transcript Reference Nov 12 transcript Pg. 141, lines 15-25 Re: Accrued Interest on bond Schedule VIII, 3rd Revision-November 17, 2003 J. C. Roberts |
|
| U Hydro # 35 |
December 3, 2003 Requested by Consumer Advocate - Transcript Reference Dec 2, Pg. 55, lines 13-17 Provide the fuel consumption in these communities (Williams Harbour, Norman’s Bay and Francois) where the program was established prior to the implementation of the program to the post program period. |
|
| U Hydro # 36 |
December 3, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Dec 2, pg. 146 , lines 4-14 Provide an updated Table 5 to Sam Banfield’s evidence of October 31, 2003 to show the revised mill per kilowatt hour rates. |
|
| U Hydro # 37 |
December 9, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Dec 3, pg. 144, lines 8-20 Reference: Schedule XVI – K. C. McShane – beta for NICOR over the previous nine to twelve months prior to March of 2003. Provide what the beta was in June of 2002 as compared to March of 2003. |
|
| U NP # 1 |
December 9, 2003 Requested by Industrial Customers - Transcript Reference Dec 9, pg. 112, Provide an indication of the annual energy production at Newfoundland Power's thermal generating plants |
|
| U NP # 2 |
December 9, 2003 Requested by Board Hearing Counsel - Transcript Reference Dec 9, pg. 148, Provide a graph compararable to Chart 5 on page 21 of the Perry-Henderson Pre-Filed Evidence comparing forecast to actual for both demand and energy for the period 1993 to 2002 |
|